domingo, 23 de octubre de 2016

“We don’t need, no, education” –Some teachers

Disclaimer: In this LOOOOONG entry you will find that I can be very polite, subliminal and eloquent to express the hate I feel towards some teachers and the beautiful euphemisms, ironies and sarcasm I use to describe them. In case you are not able to notice it, I’ll write all these in cursive. You’ve been warned.


Between last week and this one, an exam called “Aprender” is being taken all over Argentina addressed to students who are in the last year of primary school and last years of secondary school, with the purpose of knowing the current estate of education. This, believe it or not, generated controversy and some devote teachers and some hard-working teacher guilds opposed to this exam arguing that it does not consider the context of each student/school/etc. People –teachers, education professionals, etc.– that agree that this exam has to be taken, state that it is necessary to have a base from which to start in order to solve any education issue.


To begin with, I have to say that I’m getting really sick and tired of writing about “friend or foe” stuff and the competitiveness on every aspects of our confrontational country. We even have to disagree on this exam that, more than an exam, is a kind of census that can tell us whether we’re OK or NOT OK. For God’s sake, IT’S JUST AS SIMLPE AND LOGIC AS THAT! It’s a diagnosis for our sick –in many ways– country. As Fernando Iglesias, an Argentinian philosopher, said in a TV show: “It seems that those teachers, when they go to a doctor, ask them to tell them their diagnosis but refuse to be checked.” I interpret that in a double sense, because, from my experience, I know that many workaholic teachers take medical leave thanks to their friendly doctors in order to extend their holiday’s period. Returning to the topic, if logic cannot cope with some teachers’ powerful, beyond-logic and magnificent minds, there might be some mysterious reasons why those teachers don’t want their students to take this exam.





I know that some of the questions that are being asked on the exam, apart from basic education questions related to Mathematics, Grammar, History, etc., are related to “Does your teacher yell?”, “Does your teacher treat your classmates well?” and things like that. And I totally agree on questions like than being made. Schools are cloisters where children and teenagers spend most part of their time and we have to know, on the whole, what is happening inside classrooms and schools. If we are so concerned about security, we must know what children and teenagers have to say about schools and teachers and how are they being treated.

My little experience as a teacher is mostly full of joy. I’ve had a great time with students but I cannot say the same in relation to most of my colleagues. The majority of teachers don’t seem to love their job as much as I do. In fact, I don’t know why they have decided to be teachers, to begin with. Every time I talk with students, they tell me that their teachers, for instance, English teachers, would give them some paragraphs to translate without having been taught how to do it, nor even the basic stuff and then they, teachers, would come and sit on their desk and start using their cellphones or computers. And what is starting to become a cliché is the habitué of teachers to tell their students that they don’t care if they learn or not because, at the end of the day, they will get paid anyway. And no, this is not a euphemism; it is words more or words least, exactly what they say to them. These sophisticated and eccentric creatures, so-called teachers, don’t seem to be concerned about the future of their students. They don’t consider students as human beings, as subjects, as existences but just simple papers of an office work where they have to wait anxiously fingering their time-killer cellphones and computers until it’s time to leave and get paid. I HATE THEM!
 










I think that I’ve been pretty obvious, but in case you missed my point because I distracted you with my resentment towards some of the high lineage of responsible highbrow specimens under the name of “teachers”, I think that the mysterious reasons why they don’t want to take the exams have to do with their behavior towards students and the educative institution and the lack of respect they have for their profession. Do they feel THAT guilty so as not to let the Estate take a census? Coincidence?



To conclude this not-so-brief piece of writing with undercover anger towards my colleagues I would like to contrast my negative conception with my positive one. I’ve also known teachers that love their students and want their best for them and do their best for them. They know that the future of a person is in the palm of their hands and won’t let them fall. They’re well aware of the consequences that the lack of responsibility can lead to, in relation to students. They understand that a student that is not going well at school or fails in an exam –any exam– is capable of improving. They also understand that their behavior, the student’s, is a consequence of a social context where they had to react in order to survive. They know that students are not the ones to blame. I identify with those kinds of teachers that, unfortunately, are the few. I feel that that is my responsibility as a teacher. It’s something I have to do.

-Jorge Vallejos

Sexism is dead(ly)


Lately, we’ve been bombarded by social networks, media and newspapers with protests and marches related to diverse feminist groups, women that –supposedly- ask for security and people in general from all over the country in a –supposed- common purpose which is to “do something” about the “women being killed by men” issue. The aim of these movements is fair, justifiable and understandable but the problem is that there are some things that do not coincide and lead social order to crumbles.


First of all, one of the main issues here are the confusing objectives that some of those groups have. At one hand, there are pacifist groups of women that ask for social welfare, protection and the fulfillment of woman rights. These groups can be diverse and, although they can have discrepancies, their main aims coincide. But on the other hand, there are some “active” groups that tend to force society to believe and do what they do by violent manifestations and acts. The incoherence of this mixture that results from the unorganized (re)union leads to controversial social effects and destructive aftermaths like vandalism, violence towards representatives of the Estate, disruption of social order, etc.



Another issue is the “friend or foe” position in which some people want you to be. This is something that I’ve already stated in my previous entry about such competitive and bipolar country Argentina can be. If you don’t believe what they believe, then you are against. If you disagree with what they state, then you are the enemy. If you are not with us, women, you are men. And this is absolutely not the way to deal with any subject. To be organized and to reach any end, we need to take things seriously. Gender violence –and violence in general- is a delicate question to deal with and not a championship between rivals that has to be won.



The last point that I would like to express is the misconception of a “chauvinist society” that, lately, we are continuously hearing everywhere. This is not a chauvinist society. Like it or not, there are many changes that this society has gone through over decades of social evolution and revolution and we shouldn’t determine it as chauvinist. I think is a total lack of respect for the people that have fought over the years and the ones that have died for making a change. Of course that we’re still need to change plenty of things, there’s a lot to do, but “woman”, “men”, “sex”, “family” and many other concepts have changed and are consider totally different than they were ten, twenty or fifty years ago. We are in the right path, so let’s not spoil it, ok?




All in all, I think that violence is an urgent and totally relevant subject to deal with and I’m well aware that women along with children and old people are the most vulnerable part of our society and that all of them have to be protected. But we need to come clean, to clear things out and to establish equality and social order to reach what we all want to reach: social welfare. Men and women as one, because "we are in this together now".

-Jorge Vallejos